Thursday, January 23, 2020
Internationalization Of Accounting Standards For Consolidation - Japan :: essays research papers fc
 Internationalization of Accounting Standards for Consolidation - Japan: A Case  Study    The purpose of this paper will be to examine problems with internationalization  of accounting standards for consolidations on methods from an international  perspective - specifically, in the US and Japan. This is an especially timely  topic as standardization of financial markets is a prerequisite to international  free trade. Given the trends toward greater globalization, the motivations of  companies for seeking a uniform accounting system are strong. If companies have  to prepare their accounts according to several different sets of rules, in order  to communicate with investors in the various capital markets in which they  operate or for other national purposes, they incur a considerable cost penalty  and feel that money is wasted. This significantly limits global opportunities  for multinational businesses. Thus, it is important to understand what the  differences are between accounting standards, why they exist, and what problems  they pose.    It is worth noting that no one nation has a set of accounting rules which  appears to have such clear merits that they deserve adoption by the whole world.  No one country can claim to have a uniquely correct set of rules. The United  States has the longest history of standard setting. It has the largest standard  setting organization which is characterized by high standards of professionalism.  But, even the rules of the United States exhibit compromises between different  interests of a kind which could have reasonably been decided otherwise.  Furthermore, no unanimity exists among U.S. accountants about the merits of the  precise details of the compromises that have been struck. For example, the  recent discussion memorandum on consolidation outlines three different methods  which are GAAP in the US (Beckman, 1995). No one nation has a clear right, on  the basis of existing achievements, to be regarded as predominant in accounting.  A great deal more work is needed by accountants from different countries before  we can reach the point of having a well founded basis for uniformity.    People who study differences among systems of accounting rules are inclined to  group countries into two categories. On the one hand, there are countries where  business finance is provided more by loans than by equity capital, where  accounting rules are dominated by taxation considerations and where legal  systems customarily incorporate codes with detailed rules for matters such as  accounting. The effect of taxation systems can be particularly pervasive. Often,  the taxation system effectively offers tax breaks for businesses by allowing  generous measurement of expenses and modest measurement of revenues on condition  that these measurements are used for general reporting purposes. Companies have  strong incentives to take advantage of these taxation concessions as real cash    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.